Norva Bridge
A route off SAS onto validated open analytics, with equivalence testing that shows the replacement produces the same numbers before anything is switched off.
The question that stalls the move
Licence cost is what starts a SAS migration conversation in India, and proof is what stops it. Nobody will retire a validated macro library on the promise that the replacement is equivalent, least of all for a study already filed.
Bridge treats the proof as the deliverable. Conversion is the easy half; the equivalence report is the part that lets a quality team sign.
- Repository scanningWhat you actually have, before estimating the work
- Dependency analysisWhat breaks if a macro changes
- SAS and macro conversionIncluding PROC translation and metadata
- Equivalence testingOld output against new, dataset by dataset
- Regression testingAutomated, and repeatable as the estate moves
- RollbackBecause a migration that cannot be reversed will not be started
What you are left holding
A migration is finished when someone can show a reviewer that the numbers did not change. These outputs are built for that conversation rather than for a project status meeting.
- Converted codeIn a validated environment, under version control
- Equivalence reportWhere output matched, and where it did not
- Validation reportEvidence a quality team can accept
- Migration scorecardWhat moved, what remains, what needs a decision
Considering a move off SAS?
We will scan a representative slice of your estate and tell you what converts cleanly, what does not, and where the equivalence risk sits.